Skip to content
English
By RightEuropean rights, in situation
ODERSA association · Taking Part programmeIndependent educational site. Not an official website of the European Union.

The written walkthrough

The product that fails too soon: the written walkthrough

A €129 headset, a failure at eighteen months, and a seller waving a manufacturer's warranty that expired six months ago. The guarantee that matters is not that one: it is legal, it lasts two years, and it applies independently of any commercial guarantee.

Law as verified onJuly 29, 2026

This walkthrough contains the answers. It is here so you can read the situation without playing it, print it, and so the content stays complete without JavaScript.

Item no. 1 · Eighteen months, then silence

Your headset, bought for €129 eighteen months ago from an online electronics shop, will not switch on any more. No drop, no water: it went quiet last night and never came back.

You write to the seller. The reply lands in ten minutes, friendly and final.

After-sales service replyFile V6R-D19

We have checked: your headset came with a 12-month manufacturer's warranty, which has now expired.

We are therefore unable to take any further action on your request. We invite you to browse our current range.

This file is closed.

The 12-month warranty has expired, that much is true. So what?

Correct answer · I invoke the other guarantee, the legal one: the seller is liable for defects for two years.

The guarantee that matters lasts two years, and it does not come from the manufacturer The text lays it down in one sentence: the seller is liable for any lack of conformity which exists at the time of delivery and which becomes apparent within two years. It is a Directive: this floor holds everywhere in the Union, as a minimum, and your country may provide better. The twelve-month manufacturer's warranty was a service on top, never a ceiling.

“1. The seller shall be liable to the consumer for any lack of conformity which exists at the time when the goods were delivered and which becomes apparent within two years of that time.”

In plain words: two years, from delivery, on the seller's account. The manufacturer's warranty may expire; this one has not.

Article 10(1) · Directive (EU) 2019/771 (sale of goods), Article 10 (Liability of the seller), paragraph 1 · https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02019L0771-20260731

Myth · 12 months was THE warranty. Expired, so it is over.

The most profitable myth in the shop: the warranty is the manufacturer's one A commercial guarantee is a supplement: it can offer more, it can never trim the floor. The official page of the Union says it word for word: it can never exclude or reduce your rights under the minimum 2-year guarantee. A twelve-month warranty therefore never shortened anything: it simply stopped before the other one did.

“Shops or producers might offer you an additional commercial guarantee (also known as a "warranty"). This can give you better protection but can never exclude or reduce your rights under the minimum 2-year guarantee.”

In plain words: the manufacturer's warranty adds, it does not replace. When it runs out, the legal guarantee keeps running.

Section “Commercial guarantees” · Guarantees: a commercial guarantee can never reduce the legal one · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Myth · The manufacturer is the one to write to: they made the headset.

The myth: the product comes from the factory, so the problem goes there too The legal guarantee names a debtor, and it is not the factory: it is the seller, the one who took your money. The official page of the Union writes that your legal guarantee rights are held against the seller, and that they apply independently of any commercial guarantee. The manufacturer may be faster, kinder, closer: it is not the one who owes you.

“As a consumer in the EU you also benefit from legal guarantee rights against the seller. The legal guarantee applies independently of any commercial guarantee.”

In plain words: your claim goes to the seller, and it depends on no paper from the manufacturer.

Page “Commercial guarantee of durability” · Commercial guarantee of durability: the legal guarantee applies independently · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/commercial-guarantee-durability/index_en.htm

Item no. 2 · The conditions that do not exist

The after-sales service reopens the file, in its own way: by drawing up a list of conditions.

Conditions for processingFile V6R-D19

For any request outside the manufacturer's warranty, the product must reach us in its complete original packaging, with all accessories and the protective film.

A €25 diagnostic fee is charged before any analysis. It is non-refundable if the claim is rejected.

Otherwise, the product will be returned as is, at the customer's expense.

The original packaging was recycled seventeen months ago. What do you do?

Correct answer · I send the headset as it is: the text sets two conditions, the defect and the time limit. And bringing it into conformity is free.

Repair or replace, at no cost: the words are in the official sentence The official page of the Union holds in two sentences: if the goods turn out to be faulty, the seller must repair or replace them at no cost; if that is impossible or too slow, a full or partial refund. A €25 entry ticket to claim a free guarantee is exactly what the words “at no cost” rule out.

“Under EU rules, if the goods you buy turn out to be faulty or do not look or work as advertised, the seller must repair or replace them at no cost. If this is impossible or the seller cannot do it within a reasonable time and without significant inconvenience to you, you are entitled to a full or partial refund.”

In plain words: putting it right is on them, not on you. And if it drags on or fails, the money comes back.

Section “Legal guarantee” · Guarantees: the legal guarantee, free repair or replacement · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Myth · Without the original packaging I have no rights left: everyone knows that.

The original-box myth Reread the sentence that founds the guarantee: it speaks of a lack of conformity which exists at delivery and becomes apparent within two years. The defect, the time limit: those are the two conditions of the text. The word “packaging” appears nowhere in this Article. A house policy may ask you for a box; it cannot make it a condition of your right.

“1. The seller shall be liable to the consumer for any lack of conformity which exists at the time when the goods were delivered and which becomes apparent within two years of that time.”

In plain words: the guarantee turns on the defect and the date, not the box. Keep the proof of purchase instead: that one is useful.

Article 10(1) · Directive (EU) 2019/771 (sale of goods), Article 10 (Liability of the seller), paragraph 1 · https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02019L0771-20260731

Myth · I pay the €25 diagnostic fee: it is the procedure, and it will be faster.

The myth: processing fees are normal The text grants rights, it does not sell tickets. In the event of a lack of conformity, you are entitled to have the goods brought into conformity, to a proportionate price reduction, or to terminate the contract: that is the Article's list, and none of those three routes is for sale. A fee charged as a precondition is not a procedure, it is a tollbooth in front of a right.

“1. In the event of a lack of conformity, the consumer shall be entitled to have the goods brought into conformity or to receive a proportionate reduction in the price, or to terminate the contract, under the conditions set out in this Article.”

In plain words: the text says “shall be entitled”. A right is exercised, not paid for at the door.

Article 13(1) and (2) · Directive (EU) 2019/771 (sale of goods), Article 13 (Remedies for lack of conformity), paragraphs 1 and 2 · https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02019L0771-20260731

Item no. 3 · The eighteen-month question

The seller changes angle. The next message is more technical, and it is the finest moment of the whole file.

Legal department replyFile V6R-D19

As your product is more than one year old, it falls to you to prove that the defect existed at the time of delivery.

Without a technical expert report establishing this point, produced at your expense, no claim will be accepted.

This rule is the same everywhere in Europe.

“The same everywhere in Europe.” Is it, though?

Correct answer · I check my country's rule: the presumption holds for one year everywhere as a minimum, and two years in some countries.

At eighteen months, the burden of proof depends on the country. The guarantee does not. The text presumes that any defect appearing within one year existed at delivery, unless the seller proves otherwise, and it lets each Member State extend that period to two years. At eighteen months there are therefore two Europes: the one where the presumption still covers you, and the one where it is yours to substantiate. What changes in neither: the two-year guarantee itself, and the fact that their “same everywhere” was false.

“1. Any lack of conformity which becomes apparent within one year of the time when the goods were delivered shall be presumed to have existed at the time when the goods were delivered, unless proved otherwise or unless this presumption is incompatible with the nature of the goods or with the nature of the lack of conformity. […] 2. Instead of the one-year period laid down in paragraph 1, Member States may maintain or introduce a period of two years from the time when the goods were delivered.”

In plain words: for the first year, it is for the seller to prove the defect was not there. After that, it depends on the country: some extend this protection to two years, others do not. Check yours before you write.

Article 11(1) and (2) · Directive (EU) 2019/771 (sale of goods), Article 11 (Burden of proof), paragraphs 1 and 2 · https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02019L0771-20260731

Myth · At 18 months it is necessarily on them to prove: the burden of proof is reversed for the whole guarantee.

The mirror myth: the proof always weighs on the seller It is the opposite excess to their lie, and it costs just as much. The official page of the Union is precise: no proof on your side within 1 year of delivery, and in some EU countries that period is 2 years. One year is the floor guaranteed everywhere; two years is a national option. At eighteen months, the presumption is not a given: it gets checked, country by country.

“If a defect becomes apparent within 1 year of delivery, you don't have to prove it existed at the time of delivery. It is assumed that it did unless the seller can prove otherwise. In some EU countries, this period of “reversed burden of proof” is 2 years.”

In plain words: one year of presumption everywhere, two years in some countries. In between, you look up your national rule instead of guessing it.

Section “Legal guarantee” · Guarantees: the reversed burden of proof, one year, two in some countries · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Myth · If I have to prove anything, it is lost in advance. I give up.

The myth: proof on my side, case lost The presumption is a help, not the doorway to the right. What founds your claim is the minimum 2-year guarantee, and it is still running: the official page even adds that national rules in your country may give you extra protection. Giving up over a question of proof is mistaking one working detail of the file for the file itself.

“You always have the right to a minimum 2-year guarantee from the moment you received the goods. However, national rules in your country may give you extra protection.”

In plain words: the right still stands. The question of proof gets handled, not fled.

Section “Legal guarantee” · Guarantees: the minimum two-year guarantee · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Item no. 4 · The last-chance voucher

The seller's tone softens all at once. The offer arrives in a pastel box, with a forty-eight-hour countdown.

Exceptional commercial offerValid 48 h
Your headset
discontinued model, out of stock
Our gesture
€30 voucher
Repair
not offered
Replacement
not offered
Condition
full and final settlement, file permanently closed

€30 in full and final settlement, on a headset that cost €129. What do you answer?

Correct answer · I restate the order of the text: repair or replacement at my choice, otherwise a price reduction or termination.

You choose between repair and replacement, not their stock levels The text gives the exact order: bringing the goods into conformity first, and to obtain it, the consumer may choose between repair and replacement. Their only exits are written down: the chosen remedy being impossible, or disproportionate costs compared to the other one. An empty warehouse may make replacement impossible; it does not make repair vanish, nor the money that follows.

“2. In order to have the goods brought into conformity, the consumer may choose between repair and replacement, unless the remedy chosen would be impossible or, compared to the other remedy, would impose costs on the seller that would be disproportionate, taking into account all circumstances”

In plain words: the choice is yours first. Their exceptions exist, but it is for them to invoke them, not for you to assume them.

Article 13(1) and (2) · Directive (EU) 2019/771 (sale of goods), Article 13 (Remedies for lack of conformity), paragraphs 1 and 2 · https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02019L0771-20260731

Myth · I accept the €30: an old headset is not worth much anyway.

The myth: they cannot replace it, so it is a voucher or nothing When repair and replacement fall away, the text does not stop: it opens the proportionate reduction of the price or the termination of the contract, notably where the seller has not completed repair or replacement, or where it is clear the seller will not do so within a reasonable time. That is a follow-up in money, measured against the price paid. A €30 voucher is neither a proportionate reduction nor a termination: it is a commercial offer, which you are free to refuse.

“The consumer shall be entitled to either a proportionate reduction of the price in accordance with Article 15 or the termination of the sales contract in accordance with Article 16 in any of the following cases: (a) the seller has not completed repair or replacement […] (d) the seller has declared, or it is clear from the circumstances, that the seller will not bring the goods into conformity within a reasonable time, or without significant inconvenience for the consumer.”

In plain words: if they neither repair nor replace, the law switches to money. The amount is discussed from the price, not from their generosity.

Article 13(4) · Directive (EU) 2019/771 (sale of goods), Article 13 (Remedies for lack of conformity), paragraph 4 · https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02019L0771-20260731

No effect · I take the headset apart myself, video tutorial open, hairdryer in hand to unglue the shell.

The guarantee covered repair, not kitchen-table surgery This teardown fixes nothing and complicates everything: putting the goods right is their job, and the text says at no cost. If the product is faulty, the seller must repair or replace it, without you playing technician. Put the hairdryer away, gather the screws, and put the file back on the written track.

“if the goods you buy turn out to be faulty or do not look or work as advertised, the seller must repair or replace them at no cost”

In plain words: the repair is owed, and it is at their expense. Your screwdriver has no legal obligations.

Section “Legal guarantee” · Guarantees: the legal guarantee, free repair or replacement · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Item no. 5 · The final refusal, and what comes next

Last message from the seller, three lines this time. The word “final” appears twice: that is usually the sign that it is time to change counterpart.

The seller's final positionFile V6R-D19

Our position is final: no claim will be accepted for this product.

No further replies will be sent on this subject.

Thank you for your trust.

The seller has said their last word. Who says the next one?

Correct answer · I do, but elsewhere: the European Consumer Centre for a cross-border purchase, and the Small Claims Procedure last.

A seller's refusal is not a judgment The official page of the Union provides for exactly your situation: a problem getting a repair or refund in another EU country, and the European Consumer Centre in your country to help. Your file is strong: a defect within the period, written replies, an explicit refusal. That is precisely what a redress body works with.

“If you have a problem with cancelling a contract or getting a repair or refund in another EU country, the European Consumer Centre in your country can help.”

In plain words: after the seller, there is an official network built for disputes between EU countries. Your written file is its raw material.

Section “Where to get help” · Guarantees: where to get help · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Myth · “Final” means final: when a company has ruled, it is over.

The myth: the company has ruled A company rules on nothing: it takes a position, and its position does not extinguish a right. The minimum 2-year guarantee is still running, your country may even give you extra protection, and the redress routes exist precisely for the cases where the seller says no. A final refusal is not the end of the file: it is the end of the conversation with them.

“You always have the right to a minimum 2-year guarantee from the moment you received the goods. However, national rules in your country may give you extra protection.”

In plain words: the right does not switch off because it was denied. It just changes counterpart.

Section “Legal guarantee” · Guarantees: the minimum two-year guarantee · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Myth · Anyway, all this only works for new goods: second-hand and refurbished have no guarantee at all.

The myth: second-hand means no guarantee Second-hand goods bought from a professional seller are covered by the same minimum 2-year guarantee. In some countries, you and the seller may agree on a shorter period, but never below one year, and only if that is made clear at the time of purchase. A “sold as seen, no guarantee” scribbled on a professional invoice is not one of the options.

“Second-hand goods that you buy from a professional seller are also covered by the minimum 2-year guarantee. In some EU countries, you can agree with the seller on a guarantee period of less than 2 years. However, it must be no shorter than 1 year. This should be made clear at the time of purchase.”

In plain words: professional second-hand is guaranteed too. At worst one year, if agreed and clearly stated, never zero.

Section “Second-hand goods” · Guarantees: second-hand goods · https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees/index_en.htm

Verdict · What an expired warranty was worth

An expired manufacturer's warranty, a recycled cardboard box, a diagnostic fee, a pastel voucher: four obstacles, zero Articles of law behind them.